A claim is not a behavior
A stated control describes what should happen. A buyer may need to understand how the system actually behaves.
AI ASSURANCE · IN DEVELOPMENT
We are building an independent AI assurance service focused on observable behavior and evidence that is useful to both AI vendors and enterprise buyers.
We are at an early stage, speaking with teams bringing AI products into enterprise environments.
Policies, documentation and internal testing are essential. When an AI system enters an enterprise workflow, though, additional questions may call for further assessment.
A stated control describes what should happen. A buyer may need to understand how the system actually behaves.
When a system changes materially, it matters whether earlier findings still apply.
Engineering, security and procurement teams view risk differently. They need precise findings with a clear scope and explicit limitations.
We do not want to replace internal controls. We want to make their outcomes easier to assess and communicate when decisions matter.
Focus on observable AI behavior in an agreed scope, not solely on statements in documents.
Findings should be understandable in context, with the assessment scope and its limitations made explicit.
Evaluation suited to the system’s intended context.
Claims should never exceed the supporting evidence.
A new system version raises new questions about earlier findings.
The client journey should be straightforward. The full technical methodology is defined with the team, within an agreed scope.
Start with the system, its intended use and the questions that matter to the team and its customers.
Conduct a focused assessment in agreed conditions, without assuming every AI response is deterministic.
Organize observations into understandable evidence and findings, separating what was assessed from what remains uncertain.
When a system changes materially, existing evidence may need to be updated. That is the principle behind our continuous assurance vision.
We are exploring where greater clarity about AI behavior can help vendors and buyers make better-informed decisions.
Output reliability, appropriate source use and confidentiality of sensitive information.
Controls, operational boundaries and interactions with sensitive data or processes.
Candidate data handling, consistent behavior and human oversight.
Autonomy, access boundaries and behavior across tools and enterprise workflows.
Our vision is to provide an independent, understandable reference on AI-system behavior without mistaking an assessment for an absolute guarantee of safety.
The full platform is being developed. Early partnerships will also help establish its value and appropriate scope.
If you sell an AI product to enterprise customers, we would like to understand what evidence they ask for, how you prepare it today and what would make it genuinely useful.